공지
- [ 2024-05-07 ] 2024년 한국의료윤리학회 춘계학술대회 개최 안내(5/25(토))
- [ 2024-04-30 ] [2024년 생명윤리정책연구 자유공모 지원사업] 최종 선정과제 안내
- [ 2024-04-30 ] 『생명윤리 언론동향 브리프』 제13호 발간 안내
- [ 2024-04-30 ] 2024년 상반기(5월) 유전자검사기관 종사자 교육 안내
- [ 2024-04-30 ] [학술지 발간] 『생명, 윤리와 정책』 제8권 제1호 발간 안내
관련 논문
*정책원 미소장 자료이며 관련 논문 소개 게시판입니다. 게시물 관련링크를 눌러 소속기관에서 열람가능한지 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
lib@nibp.kr
글 수 4,667
| 발행년 : | 2011 |
|---|---|
| 구분 : | 학위논문 |
| 학술지명 : | |
| 관련링크 : | http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12292037 |
임상시험 연구윤리에 대한 임상연구자들의 인식 및 태도 조사 = A study of a researcher's views and attitudes concerning human research ethics
http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12292037
- 저자
손순영
- 형태사항
vii, 50p. : 도표 ; 26 cm
- 일반주기
단면인쇄임
부록수록
지도교수: 안형식
참고문헌: p 41-42 - 학위논문사항
학위논문(석사)-- 고려대학교 보건대학원 : 보건정책및병원관리학과 2011. 2
- 발행국
서울
- 언어
한국어
- 출판년
2011
초록 (Abstract)
- Abstract A study of a researcher's views and attitudes concerning human research ethics Department of Health Policy and Hospital Management Graduate School of Public Health, Korea University (Supervising Professor : Hyeong-sik Ahn M.D, Ph.D) Objectives : This study aimed to step up clinical research ethics and figure out the needs of its education by reviewing domestic and foreign laws and systems of clinical research ethics and examining researchers' notions about it. Methods : The results of the survey were analysed with SPSS.12.0 of which frequency analysis, ANOVA, Two sample t-test and chi-squared test were carried out. Results : The study's major findings were as below. As for the general information of the respondents, women outnumbered men and most of them were in their 30s making their livings as researchers. Their major was mostly biotechnology. Specifically, many specialized in indirect clinical research such as studying human tissues and cells and had master's degrees. As asked their awareness of clinical research ethics related laws and systems, 34% of respondents said they were well aware. Also, those who received related education proved to be more aware of laws and systems than those who didn't. Among the respondents, those whose research plans were reviewed by IRB outnumbered those whose plans had never been. The main reason for IRB review was to 'publish papers in foreign journals' Asked how they found IRB review, most of them stated that there were too complicated procedures for documentation and too many formal documents required and called for the simplification of the procedures. As for questions asking what was the most important to raise levels of clinical research ethics, enactment and enforcement of more strict laws topped the list. Those who received ethics education emphasized the importance of the education more than those who didn't. The analysis showed statistically significant difference. Conclusion : Most of researchers generally made positive assessments on IRB review but they complained of the complicated procedures and requirements. In this regard, IRB review needed to be simplified. Most of them had only partial awareness of laws and systems which would serve as basic standards when they carried out clinical research. Therefore, to raise the levels of research ethics, more systematic and regular education programs need to be developed and implemented to get substantial results. Key words : Clinical research, Researcher, clinical research ethics, awareness and attitudes
목차 (Table of Contents)
- 목 차
- Abstract i
- Ⅰ. 서 론 1
- 1. 연구의 배경 1
- 2. 연구의 목적 3
- 3. 용어의 정의 4
- 4. 연구윤리 관련 국제지침 및 법률 6
- II. 연구대상 및 방법 8
- 1. 연구의 설계 8
- 2. 연구 대상 및 자료수집 9
- 3. 연구 도구 10
- 4. 자료분석 방법 11
- III. 연구결과 12
- 1. 연구 대상자의 일반적 특성 12
- 2. 임상시험 연구윤리에 대한 인식 15
- 1) 임상시험 연구윤리 관련 법률 및 제도에 대한 인식 15
- 2) 임상시험심사위원회(IRB)에 대한 인식 19
- 3) 우리나라 임상시험 연구윤리 수준에 대한 주관적인 인식 27
- 3. 임상시험 연구윤리 교육형태 및 인식 30
- 1) 임상시험 연구윤리 교육형태 30
- 2) 임상시험 연구윤리 교육에 대한 인식 34
- IV. 고 찰 36
- V. 결 론 40
- 참고문헌 41
- 부 록 43
- 국문요약
(†04522) 서울 특별시 중구 남대문로 113 DB다동빌딩 5층
TEL : 02-737-8970 (기획운영팀)
Copyright (c)KONIBP All Right Reserved.
Copyright (c)KONIBP All Right Reserved.
2sisstore
