- [ 2024-05-10 ] 공용위원회 심의·협약 대상 및 비용 납부 안내 규정 공고
- [ 2024-05-07 ] 2024년 한국의료윤리학회 춘계학술대회 개최 안내(5/25(토))
- [ 2024-04-30 ] [2024년 생명윤리정책연구 자유공모 지원사업] 최종 선정과제 안내
- [ 2024-04-30 ] 『생명윤리 언론동향 브리프』 제13호 발간 안내
- [ 2024-04-30 ] 2024년 상반기(5월) 유전자검사기관 종사자 교육 안내
| 발행년 : | 2014 |
|---|---|
| 구분 : | 국외학술지 |
| 학술지명 : | Social Studies of Science |
| 관련링크 : | http://www.riss.kr/link?id=O62689774 |
[자료 문의 : lib@nibp.kr / http://riss.kr 에서 직접 원문 복사 신청 가능, 관련링크 참고]
Understanding ' Anticipatory Governance'
제어번호 62689774
저자명 Guston, D.H.
학술지명 Social studies of science
권호사항 Vol.44 No.2 [2014]
발행처 SAGE PUBLICATIONS
자료유형 학술저널
수록면 218-242 [※수록면이 p5 이하이면, Review, Columns, Editor's Note, Abstract 등일 경우가 있습니다.]
ISSN 0306-3127
언어 eng
발행년도 2014년
등재정보 SCI;SSCI;SCIE;AHCI;SCOPUS
http://www.riss.kr/link?id=O62689774
Abstract
Anticipatory governance is ‘a broad-based capacity extended through society that can act on a variety of inputs to manage emerging knowledge-based technologies while such management is still possible’. It motivates activities designed to build capacities in foresight, engagement, and integration – as well as through their production ensemble. These capacities encourage and support the reflection of scientists, engineers, policy makers, and other publics on their roles in new technologies. This article reviews the early history of the National Nanotechnology Initiative in the United States, and it further explicates anticipatory governance through exploring the genealogy of the term and addressing a set of critiques found in the literature. These critiques involve skepticism of three proximities of anticipatory governance: to its object, nanotechnology, which is a relatively indistinct one; to the public, which remains almost utterly naïve toward nanotechnology; and to technoscience itself, which allegedly renders anticipatory governance complicit in its hubris. The article concludes that the changing venues and the amplification within them of the still, small voices of folks previously excluded from offering constructive visions of futures afforded by anticipatory governance may not be complete solutions to our woes in governing technology, but they certainly can contribute to bending the long arc of technoscience more toward humane ends.
Copyright (c)KONIBP All Right Reserved.
2sisstore
